The report, which features case studies from across the country\u2014from apartment buildings to roads to wastewater facilities\u2014finds that lower-carbon construction materials can generally be procured at no or marginal cost increases, while simple design changes can further minimize cost and emissions. One case study of an apartment building in Quebec, for example, found that design changes and lower-carbon materials could cut construction emissions by 30% while reducing overall construction costs by 12%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What\u2019s more, Canadian manufacturers are already producing many of the lower-carbon alternatives required, such as steel produced in electric arc furnaces, concrete that uses industrial byproducts to replace cement, and reclaimed asphalt. Supporting this kind of construction presents a unique opportunity for Canada to build its market at a time when our key trade partners, like the EU, are actively seeking cleaner products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Governments are key to ensuring we seize this opportunity. They are big builders and by requiring lower-carbon materials and design\u2014an approach known as \u201cBuy Clean\u201d\u2014they can create a strong demand signal. The federal government has already taken some steps to reduce carbon in its building projects, and has also recently introduced a \u201cBuy Canadian\u201d approach. Expanded Buy Clean policies sitting alongside Buy Canadian ones would allow us to support domestic producers while also incentivizing our industries to become more climate-competitive in a global trade environment increasingly prioritizing or requiring cleaner materials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Beyond \u201cBuy Clean,\u201d some simple regulatory changes can make a big difference, as the report elaborates. There are many different codes and standards for infrastructure construction across the country, some of which needlessly restrict the use of lower-carbon materials or design practices. Where flexibility does exist to use more recycled or other lower-carbon materials, it isn\u2019t always made use of\u2014something that could be addressed with better procurement guidance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As we build more projects, we have the opportunity to avoid locking in huge amounts of damaging emissions\u2014all while cutting costs for developers and taxpayers alike. So while we \u201cBuild Canada Strong,\u201d let\u2019s also \u201cBuild Canada Clean.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
KEY FACTS<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n- The construction sector contributed over 8%<\/a> of Canada\u2019s total emissions in 2018. And that was at less than a third of the housing starts Canada actually needs.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- For efficient, electrified buildings, the emissions associated with material production and construction, known as \u201cembodied carbon,” usually accounts for a larger portion of lifecycle carbon emissions than those from operation, like heating and cooling.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- The global low-carbon construction materials market is expected to be worth US$579 billion in 2032<\/a>, with trade partners, including the EU, increasingly looking for clean materials.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Through nine roadway case studies, we show that lifetime emissions reductions of between 17% and 31% could be achieved while reducing the per-metre cost of the roads by up to 16%.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- A study of an apartment building in Quebec found that making just two changes to the building design and replacing materials with lower-carbon equivalents would reduce embodied emissions by 30% while reducing overall construction costs by 12%.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Choosing lower-carbon material options for water infrastructure can reduce the emissions of stormwater and wastewater infrastructure with marginal cost impacts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cleanenergycanada.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Social_BuildCanadaClean-1-1024x576.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nRESOURCES<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n